BLOG

Connecticut Court Reverses Social Security Disability Case For Failure to Develop the Record – Bathrick v. Astrue

2009-07-14T21:19:30+00:00

In Bathrick v. Astrue, the District Court for the District of Connecticut reminds the ALJ’s once again that they cannot make a decision on a disability benefits claim without referring to evidence in the record that is sufficient to support it. Sarah Bathrick filed a Social Security Disability benefits claim, asserting that she’s unable to [...]

Connecticut Court Reverses Social Security Disability Case For Failure to Develop the Record – Bathrick v. Astrue2009-07-14T21:19:30+00:00

New York Court Requires Social Security Judge to Clarify Medical Record in Disability Benefits Case – Stokes v. Commissioner of Social Security

2009-07-07T22:38:45+00:00

In order to prove a claim for Social Security disability benefits, an individual must provide the Social Security Administration (SSA) with clear and convincing medical evidence that details the extent of the claimant’s impairment, its onset date and its effect on the claimant’s ability to perform work. While the Eastern District of New York recently [...]

New York Court Requires Social Security Judge to Clarify Medical Record in Disability Benefits Case – Stokes v. Commissioner of Social Security2009-07-07T22:38:45+00:00

New Jersey Court Reverses Disability Benefits Denial for Failure to Consider Claimant Testimony – Troy v. Commissioner of Social Security

2009-06-30T09:13:18+00:00

In Social Security disability cases, medical evidence – doctor’s opinions, treatment records, objective clinical studies etc. – is the key to winning a claim. That is, a clear and accurate record showing that the claimant suffers from an impairment or combination of impairments affecting his or her ability to work makes it more likely that [...]

New Jersey Court Reverses Disability Benefits Denial for Failure to Consider Claimant Testimony – Troy v. Commissioner of Social Security2009-06-30T09:13:18+00:00

Doctor Opinions in Social Security Disability Cases: Which Ones are Treating Physicians? Ash v. Commissioner of Social Security

2009-06-23T21:21:51+00:00

The “treating physician” rule – providing that the opinion of a Social Security disability claimant’s treating physician is entitled to substantial weight, unless contradicted by other substantial evidence – is an important tool in many disability benefits cases and one that is often the subject of posts on this blog. In Ash v. Commissioner of [...]

Doctor Opinions in Social Security Disability Cases: Which Ones are Treating Physicians? Ash v. Commissioner of Social Security2009-06-23T21:21:51+00:00

Social Security Disability Claims for People Who Suffer from a Combination of Impairments – Henderson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

2009-06-16T09:20:10+00:00

In order to be eligible for Social Security disability benefits, a claimant must generally prove that he or she either hasn’t worked or it is foreseeable that he or she will be unable to work of one year or more due to physical or mental impairment. The claimant’s disability need not be based on one [...]

Social Security Disability Claims for People Who Suffer from a Combination of Impairments – Henderson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration2009-06-16T09:20:10+00:00

New York Court Rejects Social Security Judge’s Decision in Disability Case, Citing Treating Physician Rule – Olenick v. Astrue

2009-06-09T14:13:59+00:00

If the Social Security Administration (SSA) were to compile a list of the most important rules for its Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) to follow in considering a disability claim, somewhere near the top would be the treating physician rule, which provides that an opinion by a claimant’s treating physician is given controlling weight if it [...]

New York Court Rejects Social Security Judge’s Decision in Disability Case, Citing Treating Physician Rule – Olenick v. Astrue2009-06-09T14:13:59+00:00

Vocational Experts and Hypothetical Questioning in Social Security Disability Cases – Sherwood v. Astrue

2009-06-02T14:30:04+00:00

A Social Security Administration (SSA) Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) reviewing a disability benefits claim will often call on a Vocational Expert (VE), a vocation rehabilitation professional who provides advice to an ALJ regarding a claimant’s ability to perform any type of work activity, to testify as to the kind of work – if any – [...]

Vocational Experts and Hypothetical Questioning in Social Security Disability Cases – Sherwood v. Astrue2009-06-02T14:30:04+00:00

New Jersey Court on “Objective Medical Evidence” in Social Security Disability Cases

2009-05-26T17:21:41+00:00

In discussing the law associated with Social Security disability benefits on this blog, we often refer to evidence: medical records, court documents, witness testimony and all of the other things that a disability claimant can present to the Social Security Administration (SSA) in attempting to prove his or her claim. In a recent case discussing [...]

New Jersey Court on “Objective Medical Evidence” in Social Security Disability Cases2009-05-26T17:21:41+00:00

Submitting “New” Evidence on Appeal in Social Security Disability Cases – Hood v. Commissioner of Social Security

2009-05-19T17:00:21+00:00

In Hood v. Commissioner of Social Security, the District Court for the Northern District of New York sheds some light on important issues regarding both conflicting medical evidence as well as that submitted late in the Social Security disability claim process. John Hood filed a claim for Social Security disability benefits, asserting that he was [...]

Submitting “New” Evidence on Appeal in Social Security Disability Cases – Hood v. Commissioner of Social Security2009-05-19T17:00:21+00:00

The Duration Requirement for Mental Impairments in a Social Security Disability Case – Peterson v. Commissioner of Social Security

2009-05-12T17:21:25+00:00

In Peterson v. Commissioner of Social Security, a federal magistrate judge explains that a person suffering from one or more severe mental impairments may be eligible for Social Security disability benefits not only if a single impairment has lasted for at least one year, but also if in combination, his limitations can be expected to [...]

The Duration Requirement for Mental Impairments in a Social Security Disability Case – Peterson v. Commissioner of Social Security2009-05-12T17:21:25+00:00

Court Explains How A Person’s Age and Previous Claims May Effect His or Her Social Security Disability Claim – Oberg v. Astrue

2009-05-05T08:57:06+00:00

In Social Security claims, age most often comes into play in determining a person’s eligibility for retirement benefits. But age can also be an important factor in determining whether a person is eligible for Social Security disability benefits. In Oberg v. Astrue, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals explains how those who review disability claims [...]

Court Explains How A Person’s Age and Previous Claims May Effect His or Her Social Security Disability Claim – Oberg v. Astrue2009-05-05T08:57:06+00:00

Court: Judge Reviewing Social Security Disability Benefits Claim Must Consider Each of the Claimant’s Alleged Impairments – Black v. Astrue

2009-04-21T20:52:22+00:00

In order to be eligible for Social Security disability benefits, a person must generally be unable to work for one year or more due to a physical or mental impairment or a combination thereof. As experienced Social Security disability lawyers representing clients in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, we understand that it’s often not [...]

Court: Judge Reviewing Social Security Disability Benefits Claim Must Consider Each of the Claimant’s Alleged Impairments – Black v. Astrue2009-04-21T20:52:22+00:00

Court: Social Security Disability Judge Can’t Reject Treating Physician’s Opinion Without Medical Evidence – Carter v. Astrue

2009-04-14T22:33:38+00:00

As experienced Social Security disability lawyers, we know that a person seeking disability benefits can go a long way in proving his or her case by presenting the opinion of a treating doctor. In Carter v. Astrue, the District Court for the Western District of Arkansas explains that a Social Security judge reviewing a claim [...]

Court: Social Security Disability Judge Can’t Reject Treating Physician’s Opinion Without Medical Evidence – Carter v. Astrue2009-04-14T22:33:38+00:00

Benefits from the Federal Public Safety Officers Benefit Act (PSOB) Helps Disabled Firefighters, Police, and First Responders

2009-04-07T14:47:19+00:00

Surprisingly few people are aware of a Federal program that can provide huge benefits to disabled police, firefighters and other first responders or to their families in case of death. It's called the Public Safety Officers Benefit Act (PSOB), and recently we were successful in obtaining these benefits for one of our clients. PSOB provides [...]

Benefits from the Federal Public Safety Officers Benefit Act (PSOB) Helps Disabled Firefighters, Police, and First Responders2009-04-07T14:47:19+00:00

Suing to Speed Up A Social Security Disability Decision – McDonald v. Astrue

2009-03-31T22:28:13+00:00

A person whose Social Security disability benefits claim is denied generally has the right to appeal the decision in a federal court. But what about when the bureaucrats charged with reviewing disability claims drag their feet? Can the claimant sue to force a decision? The Seventh Circuit explains in McDonald v. Astrue. Plaintiff Michelle McDonald [...]

Suing to Speed Up A Social Security Disability Decision – McDonald v. Astrue2009-03-31T22:28:13+00:00
Go to Top